#69 Issue closed: Improve, redesign or remove "rear validate"¶
Labels: cleanup, discuss / RFC
dagwieers opened issue at 2012-04-12 20:01:¶
When we do regular automated tests for a variety of use-cases,
distributions and (snapshot/stable) releases, there may no longer be a
use for the current rear validate functionality. But we still may want
to make it easy for users to report problems (through a more direct
channel rather than email)
We like to discuss this on the next LinuxTag meeting in order to improve, redesign or remove the current "rear validate" functionality. Any feedback or ideas from users are welcome.
gdha commented at 2012-06-19 06:14:¶
Perhaps we better move this part to the web instead of having validation reports part of a rear package?
gdha commented at 2014-10-23 07:44:¶
as this not changing any functionality of rear we keep it as it is now.
[Export of Github issue for rear/rear.]