#129 Issue closed
: Problem with more than 9 partitions ?¶
Labels: bug
jo-github opened issue at 2012-07-25 10:23:¶
My setup has 10 partitions
ReaR produces a false order in initrd.cgz: part 10 (which is a logical
one of course) is placed as second in the list:
todo /dev/sda1 part
todo /dev/sda10 part
todo /dev/sda2 part
todo /dev/sda3 part
todo /dev/sda4 part
todo /dev/sda5 part
todo /dev/sda6 part
todo /dev/sda7 part
todo /dev/sda8 part
todo /dev/sda9 part
While recovering an parted error occurs, because a logical must not follow a primary partition directly.
Consequences:
- parted wipes the partittion first (which should not be nessessary as geometry didn't change)
- parted stops with above error
- luckily one can edit this from the ReaR recovery menu, but it should not happen
BTW: is it possible to correct this in initrd.cgz of the ISO or does this break the ISO?
Joe
jo-github commented at 2012-07-25 10:27:¶
My ReaR version is
Relax-and-Recover 1.13.0-git201207200104 / 2012-07-20
Previous 1.13 version had the same problem.
Joe
gdha commented at 2012-10-31 15:14:¶
if you could add a debug output to gist.github.com then that would be very useful for us.
jo-github commented at 2012-10-31 21:26:¶
What exactly do you need?
This is the relevant part of disklayout.conf in detail:
disklayout.conf^@^@^@disk /dev/sda 320072933376 msdos
part /dev/sda 1258435584 32256 primary none /dev/sda1
part /dev/sda 98636398592 221436182528 logical none /dev/sda10
part /dev/sda 136549584384 1258467840 primary boot /dev/sda2
part /dev/sda 11270094848 137808052224 primary none /dev/sda3
part /dev/sda 1024 149078147072 extended lba /dev/sda4
part /dev/sda 8388608000 149079195648 logical none /dev/sda5
part /dev/sda 524288000 157468852224 logical none /dev/sda6
part /dev/sda 31457280000 157994188800 logical none /dev/sda7
part /dev/sda 524288000 189452517376 logical none /dev/sda8
part /dev/sda 31457280000 189977853952 logical none /dev/sda9
jhoekx commented at 2012-11-01 10:27:¶
I think we will be able to reproduce this. Never tested with that many partitions.
gdha commented at 2014-04-02 08:29:¶
@jo-github @jhoekx same issue as #352 . Is fixed to my best knowledge.
jo-github commented at 2014-04-02 18:43:¶
Am Wednesday 02 April 2014 10:29:16 schrieb gdha:
@jo-github @jhoekx same issue as #352 . Is fixed to my best knowledge.
Thanks a lot!
Joe
[Export of Github issue for rear/rear.]