#575 Issue closed
: remove temp dir¶
Labels: enhancement
goldzahn opened issue at 2015-04-14 13:50:¶
Hi,
on every server I have the problem that
/tmp/rear.XXXXXXXXX/outputfs/servername/ is not empty,
because of the file ".lockfile", so rmdir is never successful (see
#298)
The solution of #298 was to add rm -Rf $BUILD_DIR/outputfs
in function cleanup_build_area_and_end_program()
in usr/share/rear/lib/framework-functions.sh
but this lead to problems mentioned in #465,
so it was changed to rmdir $v $BUILD_DIR/outputfs >&2
Looking at function cleanup_build_area_and_end_program() in usr/share/rear/lib/framework-functions.sh:
...
# line below put in comment due to issue #465
#rm -Rf $BUILD_DIR/outputfs
rmdir $v $BUILD_DIR/outputfs >&2
# in worst case it could not umount; so before remove the BUILD_DIR check if above outputfs is gone
mount | grep -q "$BUILD_DIR/outputfs"
if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
# still mounted it seems
LogPrint "Directory $BUILD_DIR/outputfs still mounted - trying lazy umount"
sleep 2
umount -f -l $BUILD_DIR/outputfs >&2
rmdir $v $BUILD_DIR/outputfs >&2
fi
rmdir $v $BUILD_DIR >&2
fi
Log "End of program reached"
Wouldn't it be better to drop the first
rmdir $v $BUILD_DIR/outputfs >&2
and to add
rm -Rf $BUILD_DIR/outputfs
in case $BUILD_DIR/outputfs is not mounted?
...
# line below put in comment due to issue #465
#rm -Rf $BUILD_DIR/outputfs
# in worst case it could not umount; so before remove the BUILD_DIR check if above outputfs is gone
mount | grep -q "$BUILD_DIR/outputfs"
if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
# still mounted it seems
LogPrint "Directory $BUILD_DIR/outputfs still mounted - trying lazy umount"
sleep 2
umount -f -l $BUILD_DIR/outputfs >&2
rmdir $v $BUILD_DIR/outputfs >&2
else
# not mounted so we can safely delete $BUILD_DIR/outputfs
rm -Rf $BUILD_DIR/outputfs
fi
rmdir $v $BUILD_DIR >&2
fi
Log "End of program reached"
So if $BUILD_DIR/outputfs is not mounted,
then rm -Rf $BUILD_DIR/outputfs
can safely be used,
otherwise rmdir $v $BUILD_DIR/outputfs
would be used.
What do you think?
Regards
goldzahn
gdha commented at 2015-04-20 09:32:¶
@goldzahn good thinking - why not. Will you prepare a pull request for this? Thank you for your proposal of a proper fix for the issues around the cleanup of the temporary directory
gdha commented at 2015-05-31 15:46:¶
@goldzahn Can we close this issue?
goldzahn commented at 2015-06-02 09:29:¶
@gdha Sure.
Regards
goldzahn
[Export of Github issue for rear/rear.]