#698 Issue closed: Define default use case for ReaR

Labels: discuss / RFC

schlomo opened issue at 2015-11-17 15:01:

In relation to #696 we should decide which out-of-the-box use case to support via package dependencies.

gdha commented at 2015-11-19 12:28:

From my point of view: ISO is the default OUTPUT and therefore, the only default mechanism. All others are optional and are defined by the users, where prep scripts should trigger a warning if something crucial for that path is missing.

gdha commented at 2016-02-10 15:56:

@schlomo what do you want to do with this issue? No-one else replied...

schlomo commented at 2016-02-10 16:05:

Let's go with the ISO beeing default. Probably NETFS is also most widely used, we could consider it beeing the default BACKUP method instead of REQUEST_RESTORE.

IMHO there is no immediate need for action.


[Export of Github issue for rear/rear.]