#1051 PR closed: re-numbered 00_ 01_ and 99_ scripts to get 00_ 01_ and 99_ free

Labels: cleanup, won't fix / can't fix / obsolete

jsmeix opened issue at 2016-10-26 11:00:

re-numbered 00_ 01_ and 99_ scripts
to get 00_ 01_ and 99_ free and reserved
for user scripts see
https://github.com/rear/rear/pull/1022#issuecomment-255676605

jsmeix commented at 2016-10-26 11:01:

Do not yet merge it.
I need to test it first...

jsmeix commented at 2016-10-26 12:54:

I cannot do a re-numbering with reasonable effort
because currently ReaR works too fragile because
it runs the various backup-method specific scripts
somehow intermixed with the generic scripts.

Therefore re-numbering of generic scripts results
a different sequence how the generic scripts are run
intermixed with the backup-method specific scripts.

For example when I use "BACKUP=NETFS"
a "rear -s mkbackup" before and after my current
re-numbering results (diff output):

-Source prep/default/00_remove_workflow_conf.sh
-Source prep/default/02_translate_url.sh
-Source prep/default/03_translate_tape.sh
-Source prep/default/04_check_output_scheme.sh
+Source prep/default/02_remove_workflow_conf.sh
+Source prep/default/03_translate_url.sh
+Source prep/default/04_translate_tape.sh
 Source prep/NETFS/default/05_check_NETFS_requirements.sh
-Source prep/default/05_check_keep_old_output_copy_var.sh
+Source prep/default/05_check_output_scheme.sh
+Source prep/default/06_check_keep_old_output_copy_var.sh
...
+Source backup/default/98_post_backup_script.sh
 Source backup/NETFS/default/98_umount_NETFS_dir.sh
-Source backup/default/99_post_backup_script.sh

I.e. before it was:

Source prep/default/03_translate_tape.sh
Source prep/default/04_check_output_scheme.sh
Source prep/NETFS/default/05_check_NETFS_requirements.sh
Source prep/default/05_check_keep_old_output_copy_var.sh
Source prep/NETFS/default/06_mount_NETFS_path.sh
...
Source backup/NETFS/default/97_remove_lock.sh
Source backup/NETFS/default/98_umount_NETFS_dir.sh
Source backup/default/99_post_backup_script.sh

and after re-numbering it gets:

Source prep/default/04_translate_tape.sh
Source prep/NETFS/default/05_check_NETFS_requirements.sh
Source prep/default/05_check_output_scheme.sh
Source prep/default/06_check_keep_old_output_copy_var.sh
Source prep/NETFS/default/06_mount_NETFS_path.sh
...
Source backup/NETFS/default/97_remove_lock.sh
Source backup/default/98_post_backup_script.sh
Source backup/NETFS/default/98_umount_NETFS_dir.sh

I would have to verify and adapt for each backup method
also the backup-method specific scripts to keep the same
sequence how the generic scripts are run intermixed
with the backup-method specific scripts.

Perhaps at a later time when the issue becomes more pressing
we should do a general re-numbering probably with 3-digit
numbers 010_ ... 990_ to clean it up completely.

But for now I keep it as is to avoid regressions.

schlomo commented at 2016-10-26 20:04:

Actually renumbering everything from 501 to 599 sounds like a nice idea. Should be possible to do without breaking anything and gives lots of space before and after. Or somehow map 01..99 to 100..900 evenly.

jsmeix commented at 2016-10-27 08:36:

I am thinking about a dumb adding of a trailing '0'
to all current numbers, i.e. this mapping
00 -> 000
01 -> 010
02 -> 020
...
99 -> 990
which is mathematically a dilatation by the constant
factor 10 that preserves topology/neighbourhood.

With the first step the old numbers 01 and 99
become 010 and 990 and those are already
no longer at the edges of the range 000..999.

The only old number that is still at the edge
is 00 which becomes 000 and that one needs
an actual re-numbering (i.e. movement) a bit away
from the edge but not more than where the old 01
is now (i.e. 010) so that a second step the actual
re-numbering could be this mapping:
000 -> 005

At the end the topology/neighbourhood did not change.

I think even the symlinks can be easier adapted this way
because their target usually only canges from NM_* to NM0_*
and only if the target is 00_* it needs to be changed to 005_*
(i.e. I can adapt the symlinks in a dumb mechanical way)

This way it looks sufficiently easy and fail-safe.
I think I will do it right now, but via a new pull request.

jsmeix commented at 2016-10-27 08:43:

Furthermore because in very most cases only a trailing '0'
is added it is easier to also adapt all texts where the old
script names are used in a dumb mechanical way:
"NM_foo_bar.sh" -> "NM0_foo_bar.sh"
"00_blah.sh" -> "005_blah.sh"

jsmeix commented at 2016-10-27 10:50:

See https://github.com/rear/rear/pull/1053
how it goes on...


[Export of Github issue for rear/rear.]