#2589 PR merged
: Replace possibly misleading "USB device" by generic "USB or disk device" wording¶
Labels: enhancement
, cleanup
, fixed / solved / done
,
minor bug
jsmeix opened issue at 2021-03-24 09:03:¶
-
Type: Minor Bug Fix / Enhancement
-
Impact: Normal
-
Reference to related issue (URL):
https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/2588 -
How was this pull request tested?
Not tested - basically only message text changes. -
Brief description of the changes in this pull request:
Replace possibly misleading "USB device" by generic "USB or disk device" wording
jsmeix commented at 2021-03-24 09:37:¶
Instead of replacing "USB device" by pure "disk device"
I replaced "USB device" by "USB or disk device" to indicate with the
word "USB"
that those messages belong to the OUTPUT=USB
method
which is primarily meant to be used with "USB disk like thingies"
(i.e. removable disks that are usually attached via USB)
e.g. USB mass storage devices like USB sticks or USB disks.
pcahyna commented at 2021-03-24 09:42:¶
What about saying "Block device" instead of "USB or disk device"?
EDIT: I see that it would not satisfy the requirement of indicating the relationship to the USB method.
jsmeix commented at 2021-03-24 10:07:¶
@pcahyna
I think "block device" is technically 100% right
but mostly meaningless for the user because
basically all devices in ReaR are block devices
so one could also say only "device" which is never wrong
but completely meaningless as a superflous word like "thingy".
The general problem with the USB
stuff in ReaR is that it was added
to fulfill a specific requirement of a specific ReaR customer's use
case
so that the USB
stuff in ReaR behaves somewhat special and different
compared to other methods, i.e. USB
is somewhat incompatible, cf.
https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/2588#issuecomment-805658626
jsmeix commented at 2021-03-24 10:09:¶
If there are no objections that "USB or disk device" is wrong
i.e. if "USB or disk device" is "good enough" at least for now
I would like to merge it today afternoon.
[Export of Github issue for rear/rear.]