#2959 Issue closed
: ZFS Filesystems are not backed up¶
Labels: enhancement
, needs sponsorship
, external tool
,
no-issue-activity
mainjoehere opened issue at 2023-03-23 14:30:¶
-
ReaR version ("/usr/sbin/rear -V"):
Relax-and-Recover 2.7 / Git -
OS version ("cat /etc/os-release" or "lsb_release -a" or "cat /etc/rear/os.conf"):
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Release: 11
Codename: bullseye
- ReaR configuration files ("cat /etc/rear/site.conf" and/or "cat /etc/rear/local.conf"):
OUTPUT=ISO
BACKUP=NETFS
BACKUP_URL="nfs://192.168.1.144/media/storage/rear"
-
Hardware vendor/product (PC or PowerNV BareMetal or ARM) or VM (KVM guest or PowerVM LPAR):
VM -
System architecture (x86 compatible or PPC64/PPC64LE or what exact ARM device):
amd64 -
Storage (local disk or SSD) and/or SAN (FC or iSCSI or FCoE) and/or multipath (DM or NVMe):
local disk -
Storage layout ("lsblk -ipo NAME,KNAME,PKNAME,TRAN,TYPE,FSTYPE,LABEL,SIZE,MOUNTPOINT"):
NAME KNAME PKNAME TRAN TYPE FSTYPE LABEL SIZE MOUNTPOINT
/dev/sda /dev/sda spi disk 100G
|-/dev/sda1 /dev/sda1 /dev/sda part 1000K
|-/dev/sda3 /dev/sda3 /dev/sda part zfs_member bpool 1G
`-/dev/sda4 /dev/sda4 /dev/sda part zfs_member rpool 98,7G
/dev/sr0 /dev/sr0 ata rom 1024M
/dev/zd0 /dev/zd0 disk swap 4G [SWAP]
zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
bpool 960M 660M 300M - - 52% 68% 1.00x ONLINE -
rpool 98.5G 78.5G 20.0G - - 73% 79% 1.00x ONLINE -
zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
bpool 659M 172M 96K /boot
bpool/BOOT 646M 172M 96K none
bpool/BOOT/debian 646M 172M 222M /boot
rpool 82.7G 12.8G 192K /
rpool/ROOT 23.0G 12.8G 192K none
rpool/ROOT/debian 23.0G 12.8G 6.75G /
rpool/home 50.0G 12.8G 364K /home
rpool/home/mainzer 49.7G 12.8G 22.9G /home/mainzer
rpool/home/root 326M 12.8G 298M /root
rpool/opt 4.61G 12.8G 766M /opt
rpool/srv 4.64M 12.8G 488K /srv
rpool/swap 4.25G 17.0G 51.3M -
rpool/tmp 13.6M 12.8G 13.6M /tmp
rpool/usr 49.4M 12.8G 192K /usr
rpool/usr/local 49.2M 12.8G 38.5M /usr/local
rpool/var 417M 12.8G 192K /var
rpool/var/games 192K 12.8G 192K /var/games
rpool/var/lib 596K 12.8G 192K /var/lib
rpool/var/lib/docker 192K 12.8G 192K /var/lib/docker
rpool/var/lib/nfs 212K 12.8G 212K /var/lib/nfs
rpool/var/log 385M 12.8G 106M /var/log
rpool/var/mail 192K 12.8G 192K /var/mail
rpool/var/snap 192K 12.8G 192K /var/snap
rpool/var/spool 29.9M 12.8G 3.77M /var/spool
rpool/var/www 192K 12.8G 192K /var/www
- Description of the issue (ideally so that others can reproduce it):
rear does not backup any of the above filesystems
cat var/lib/rear/layout/disklayout.conf
# Disk layout dated 20230323150044 (YYYYmmddHHMMSS)
# NAME KNAME PKNAME TRAN TYPE FSTYPE LABEL SIZE MOUNTPOINT UUID WWN
# /dev/sda /dev/sda spi disk 100G
# |-/dev/sda1 /dev/sda1 /dev/sda part 1000K
# |-/dev/sda3 /dev/sda3 /dev/sda part zfs_member bpool 1G 10832798754208484787
# `-/dev/sda4 /dev/sda4 /dev/sda part zfs_member rpool 98.7G 18140521004606291834
# /dev/sr0 /dev/sr0 ata rom 1024M
# /dev/zd0 /dev/zd0 disk swap 4G [SWAP] 648730e3-9102-40b7-ad9a-b38be26c67e0
# Disk /dev/sda
# Format: disk <devname> <size(bytes)> <partition label type>
#disk /dev/sda 107374182400 gpt
# Partitions on /dev/sda
# Format: part <device> <partition size(bytes)> <partition start(bytes)> <partition type|name> <flags> /dev/<partition>
#part /dev/sda 1024000 24576 rear-noname bios_grub /dev/sda1
#part /dev/sda 1073741824 1048576 rear-noname none /dev/sda3
#part /dev/sda 105925210112 1074790400 rear-noname none /dev/sda4
# Filesystems (only ext2,ext3,ext4,vfat,xfs,reiserfs,btrfs are supported).
# Format: fs <device> <mountpoint> <fstype> [uuid=<uuid>] [label=<label>] [<attributes>]
# Swap partitions or swap files
# Format: swap <filename> uuid=<uuid> label=<label>
swap /dev/zd0 uuid=648730e3-9102-40b7-ad9a-b38be26c67e0 label=
jsmeix commented at 2023-03-23 14:37:¶
In general:
ZFS is not (yet?) supported by ReaR, see
https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/2773
and
https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/1932
and
https://github.com/rear/rear/issues/2563
pcahyna commented at 2023-03-23 14:46:¶
When (if?) ZFS gets supported by ReaR, it will probably have analogous issues (#2928 #2604) as btrfs has with backing up data from subvolumes, as ZFS filesystems are IIUC analogous to btrfs subvolumes.
github-actions commented at 2023-05-23 02:22:¶
Stale issue message
[Export of Github issue for rear/rear.]