#3480 Issue open
: Do we actually need dbus
in the rescue environment?¶
Labels: enhancement
lzaoral opened issue at 2025-06-16 13:18:¶
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.¶
Currently, ReaR only supports the reference implementation of dbus
since commit
https://github.com/rear/rear/commit/d82a9553cda33ad89053a00e801d157e0de080d9.
Note that the commit message does not mention "why" is was actually
added because the "Fedora dbus service required for better debugging
systemd" rationale makes no sense to me.
Fedora 29+, RHEL 9+ and possibly other distributions have switched to
dbus-broker
instead (a more-performant replacement for the reference
implementation) which ReaR does not support.
So far, I have not seen any issues with the restore on such systems, with the exception of the following harmless (but rather annoying!) log messages during the installation of GRUB2 on x64 BIOS and ppc64le PowerVM machines:
Installing GRUB2 boot loader...
Starting dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus...
[FAILED] Failed to start dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus.
See 'systemctl status dbus.service' for details.
Starting dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus...
[FAILED] Failed to start dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus.
See 'systemctl status dbus.service' for details.
Starting dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus...
[FAILED] Failed to start dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus.
See 'systemctl status dbus.service' for details.
Starting dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus...
[FAILED] Failed to start dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus.
See 'systemctl status dbus.service' for details.
Starting dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus...
[FAILED] Failed to start dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus.
See 'systemctl status dbus.service' for details.
[FAILED] Failed to start dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus.
See 'systemctl status dbus.service' for details.
# systemctl status dbus.service
× dbus.service - D-Bus System Message Bus
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/dbus.service; static)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2024-04-03 14:02:23 EDT; 1min>TriggeredBy: × dbus.socket
Process: 10983 ExecStartPre=/bin/dbus-uuidgen --ensure (code=exited, status> CPU: 6ms
Describe the solution you'd like¶
I'd like to discuss whether we actually need dbus
support in the ReaR
rescue environment. If not, I suggest to just remove everything
dbus
-related from the repository. Otherwise, the support for
dbus-broker
should be implemented.
jsmeix commented at 2025-06-16 14:19:¶
@lzaoral
a totally offhanded and untested question:
Installing GRUB2 boot loader...
happens in
usr/share/rear/finalize/Linux-i386/660_install_grub2.sh
where 'grub[2]-install' is run within chroot $TARGET_FS_ROOT
so I am wondering if Starting dbus.service
and the
subsequent Failed to start dbus.service
happens
within the ReaR recovery system or
within the restored target system?
lzaoral commented at 2025-06-16 14:44:¶
I am wondering if
Starting dbus.service
and the subsequentFailed to start dbus.service
happens within the ReaR recovery system or within the restored target system?
@jsmeix Both, to be honest. grub2-install
is executed in the restored
system using chroot
. GRUB2 installer executes os-prober
at some
point, which executes some other commands which subsequently trigger the
dbus.socket
because /run
is bind-mounted in that chroot
.
Therefore, systemd
in the recovery system will try to start the
dbus.service
(which then fails on Fedora because dbus-broker
is an
incompatible implementation).
I have experimented a bit with dbus-monitor
and os-prober
on a
regular Fedora 42 machine and it seems that the triggering messages are
just harmless signals from systemd about added/removed and (un)mounted
block devices. Mounting of various block devices is in implementation
detail of os-prober
.
(@pcahyna, please, correct me if I'm wrong.)
jsmeix commented at 2025-06-16 14:58:¶
@lzaoral
thank you for your explanation.
Now I understand that "it is complicated".
[Export of Github issue for rear/rear.]